Policy says “must”. Brief says “preferred”. Which wins?
Security policy requires EU-only hosting. The procurement brief treats it as a preference.
WIT surfaces human decisions as soon as there’s enough evidence to decide — while the agent continues everything that doesn’t need the answer yet.
Security policy requires EU-only hosting. The procurement brief treats it as a preference.
A decision can take seconds and still delay a run by hours when it is requested only after the agent reaches the dependency. WIT brings that decision forward.
The agent stops exactly when human response time begins.
Independent work continues while the right person decides.
WIT tracks upcoming human dependencies, surfaces each decision when enough evidence exists, and returns the answer before the dependent step begins.
Identify a judgment, approval or threshold that a later workflow stage may need.
Ask only when the right person can make a responsible decision — not at intake and not at the gate.
Continue every branch that does not depend on the answer, then inject it before the dependent step begins.
The interface is small. The orchestration behind it decides what to ask, when to ask, who can answer and where the answer belongs.
These interactive examples show how an early decision removes a later blocker. They demonstrate the interaction, not a live customer integration.
Bring a commercial threshold or no-bid decision forward when the evidence appears.
Settle an area, comparable or source conflict while market evidence keeps processing.
A fast agent still feels slow when human decisions sit on the critical path.
WIT lets the work and the decision happen in parallel.
Choose a long-running workflow, identify one human dependency and measure how much end-to-end time disappears when the decision moves forward.